Wednesday, July 29, 2009

A Note on the eve of Right to Education Bill in Lok Sabha.


दोस्तों,
यह पत्र अनिल सद्गोपाल जी ने शिक्षा अधिकार मन्च, भोपाल के गूगल समूह पर भेजा था। इस शिक्षा अधिकार बिल - 2008 का विरोध करने वाले देश के सभी लोगों के लिए यह पत्र इस ब्लॉग पर प्रकाशित किया जा रहा है। यह बिल अब जल्द ही विधेयक बन जाएगा और तब उसके नतीजे कितने खतरनाक होंगे, इस विषय पर यह पत्र काफी गहराई से प्रकाश डाल रहा है।

29th July 2009

Dear Friends,

I write to you this personal note on the eve of a [non]-historic so-called Right to Education Bill, 2008 Bill being tabled in Lok Sabha. Through this Note, I would attempt to share with you my sense of deep anguish and concern for the future of our Republic in its sixtieth year. Although, this Note is limited to the issue of education as a Fundamental Right, the implications encompass all aspects and dimensions of our socio-economic life.

Here is weblink to my article published in The Telegraph on 28th July 2009 (the original title of the article read as "The Bill That Denies Right to Education"):

http://www.telegraphindia.com/1090728/jsp/opinion/story_11287996.jsp

Tomorrow (i.e. 29 July 2009) the said Bill will be tabled in Lok Sabha, speeches made ("I rise to support the Bill but . . . . ") and passed expectedly by a unanimous vote after oral assurances (minus Constitutional guarantees) by the Minister of HRD that all will be well. This has been the history of this legislative process since 28th November 2001 when the 86th (then 93rd) Constitutional Amendment Bill was tabled in Lok Sabha, even as 40,000 people from several parts of India were holding a protest rally from Ramlila Grounds to Rajghat and back to Ramlila Grounds. Once this is done, we will wait for the President to sign the Bill.

The Presidential assent will mark the full conversion of a Fundamental Right into an ordinary statutory right. Who said that? Believe it or not, this was stated by the HRD Minister Mr. Kapil Sibal in May 2002 in Rajya Sabha, of course then sitting in opposition as member of the Congress Party! Why did he say that? As an eminent judicial mind of the country, he knew that the Article 21A introduced by the 86th Amendment has the conditionality that free and compulsory education shall be provided "in such manner as the State may, by law, determine." Such conditionality is not attached to any other Fundamental Right. The State was determined to attach this conditionality in order to use it for enacting a law (now being tabled in Lok Sabha on 30th July 2009) whose central objective will be to legitimize all the dilution and distortion that the school education policy has undergone initially as part of World Bank's DPEP in 1990s and later in SSA during the present decade. This was necessary in order to use the Constitution for putting a stamp of approval on the neo-liberal programme of privatization and commercialization of school education. Sibal's 100-day agenda almost completes a critical phase of the neo-liberal agenda of which this Bill is an integral part.

On 20th July 2009, when the present Bill was tabled in Rajya Sabha, several members inquired why the children below six years of ago have been kept out of their existing Fundamental Right to balanced nutrition, health support and pre-primary education. Ironically, the same Mr. Sibal who criticized Article 21A more than seven years ago in Rajya Sabha had no qualms in stating that "the [present] legislation is in the context of [Article] 21A and that is why we have not dealt with 0-5 years."

This is why I have been consistently maintaining since November 2001 that 86th Constitutional Amendment is a neo-liberal intervention in our Constitution and the consequential Right to Education Bill under Article 21A in Lok Sabha has to be viewed as a neo-liberal Bill. I wait for history to vindicate my stand.

On 23rd July 2009, the All India Forum for Right to Education (AIF-RTE) organized a delegation to meet the Lok Sabha Speaker Ms. Meira Kumar (click on the link for download the of the Memorandum with a detailed critique of the Bill). The delegation was led by Com. D. Raja, Natl. Secy of CPI and a Rajya Sabha member. Ms. Medha Patkar and Sh. Sandeep Pande joined the delegation and endorsed the AIF-RTE stand. We appealed to Ms. Meira Kumar to return the Bill to the Ministry's Parliamentary Standing Committee (or a joint select committee) with directions to hold Public Hearings on the Bill around the country in a democratic and transparent manner. Why this demand at this late stage? To be sure, this demand is 4 years and 8 months old. Public Hearings on the Bill (as well as during its drafting process) have been demanded since CABE's Kapil Sibal Committee began the process of drafting the present Bill in November 2004. However, not one Public Hearing has been held either by CABE or by the HRD Ministry – not even by the PM's Office which sat over the various drafts – each one more diluted that the previous one – for almost 39 months from August 2005 onwards. Public Hearings were denied even by the Ministry's Parliamentary Standing Committee which preferred to discuss the Bill with Ministry's bureaucrats and official 'educrats' in closed chambers rather than with representatives of various education rights organizations or people's movements, refusing to even accept submissions and Memoranda. Hence this demand to the Lok Sabha speaker.

You may like to ask what happens to children's Fundamental Right while the Public Hearings are held and the Bill amended or re-drafted on the basis of the public feedback. Would this not further delay the provision of the Fundamental Right which is about to be given after waiting for it for sixty years? NO, NOT ALL! This is so because the Fundamental Right to Education, without any conditionality whatsoever, is inherent in the Constitution, as declared by Supreme Court's Unnikrishnan Judgment (1993). Various High Courts have been giving their judgments on education as a Fundamental Right under Unnikrishnan Judgment for the past several years. This Bill is designed only to dilute and distort the existing Fundamental Right.

On 28th July, Shiksha Adhikar Manch, Bhopal organized a day-long peaceful dharna (with some members fasting) in front of Babasaheb Ambedkar's statue in Bhopal and underlined three major violations of the Constitution by the Bill being tabled before Lok Sabha. In addition, the Manch urged upon the Lok Sabha members to "rise above their narrow party considerations, listen to the voice of their inner conscience and stand up against this anti-Constitutional, anti-education and anti-child Bill that denies Fundamental Right to almost 45 crore children up to 18 years of age."
This is critical for protecting the Constitution and saving our education system from further deterioration and neo-liberal assaults which this Bill is going to institutionalize (click on the link for download Manch' Press Release in Hindi).

On the eve of this farcical and neo-liberal Bill being tabled in Lok Sabha, AIF-RTE invites all fellow citizens and like-minded people's organizations to join us in building a powerful long-term movement to challenge Sibal's agenda to sell our education system to corporate houses and the global capital and, in the process also build people's consciousness about the Constitution's vision of Right to Education. Before closing, let me add that while what is focused upon in this Note constitutes reflections on the neo-liberal assault on Fundamental Right to Education, such an assault is taking place simultaneously on all sectors of the nation's life. Drawing lessons from our sectoral concerns, we must learn to build a common political agenda to effectively resist this wide-ranging and multi-dimensional attack endangering the future of India as a sovereign nation and its survival as a democratic, egalitarian and secular society.

ZINDABAAD!

Sincerely,

Anil Sadgopal

External Links

  1. AIF-RTE Memorandum dated 23.07.2009 to Lok Sabha Speaker.
  2. Shiksha Adhikar Manch' Press Release dated 28.07.2009 regarding the dilution of the Constitution by the Bill and our call to the Lok sabha members.

Friday, May 8, 2009

शिक्षा का अधिकार और सरकार की मंशा

राज्य सभा में पेश
"बच्चों के लिए मुफ़्त और अनिवार्य शिक्षा अधिकार विधेयक, 2008"
की पैरवी करने वालों से सवाल

मानव संसाधन मन्त्रालय द्वारा मन्त्रीमंडलीय सचिवालय, भारत सरकार को फरवरी 2008 में विधेयक के प्रारूप के साथ लिखे गोपनीय पत्र* में से नीचे दिए उद्धरण को ध्यान से पढ़िए।

"संविधान (86वां संशोधन) अधिनियम, 2002 का खन्ड 1(2) कहता है कि यह उस तारीख से लागू होगा जिसकी अधिसूचना केन्द्रीय सरकार सरकारी गजट में जारी करेगी। 86वें संविधान संशोधन को बाध्यकारी बनाने में काफ़ी देरी हो चुकी है। जब तक ८६वां संविधान संशोधन बाध्यकारी नहीं बनाया जाता तब तक 0-14 आयु समूह के बच्चों को अपने दायरे में लानेवाला सुप्रीम कोर्ट का उन्नीकृष्णन प्रकरण में दिया गया फैसला देश में कानून के रूप में लागू है। अतः 86वें संविधान संशोधन, जिसके दायरे में 6-14 आयु समूह के बच्चे आते हैं, को सरकारी गजट में अधिसूचना जारी करके बाध्यकारी बनाना एक तात्कालिक ज़रूरत बन गई है।"
*पत्र सं. एफ. एन. 1-1/2008 ईई.4, फरवरी 2008 (गोपनीय)

उक्त
सरकारी पत्र ने राज्य सभा में शिक्षा अधिकार विधेयक पेश करने के पीछे केन्द्रीय सरकार की असली मंशा की पोल खोल दी है। यानी सरकार यह विधेयक सुप्रीम कोर्ट के उन्नीकृष्णन फैसले से मिले शिक्षा के मौलिक अधिकार को छीनने के लिए ला रही है।
इसीलिए इस गैर-संवैधानिक, बाल-विरोधी और निजीकरण - बाजारीकरण के समर्थक विधेयक की पैरवी करने वालों से सवाल है कि आखिर वे इसके पक्ष में क्यों खड़े हैं..?
इस मुद्दे पर बहस लोकतंत्र का तकाज़ा है।
इस पर विस्तृत विवरण आने वाली पोस्टों में दिया जाएगा।